Denial management plays a crucial role in the healthcare revenue cycle, as it ensures that healthcare providers can maintain financial stability while delivering quality patient care. By effectively addressing and reducing claim denials, organizations can optimize their revenue and minimize cash flow disruptions. Understanding the root causes of denials and implementing proactive strategies can significantly enhance the claims process. Explore further to learn how denial management can transform healthcare revenue cycles and improve operational efficiency.
Denial Management in Healthcare
Maintaining a steady flow of revenue is crucial for any healthcare organization. Failure to keep track of revenue generation processes such as billing and claims processing could harm the organization’s financial stability and, in turn, compromise patient care. Denials represent an especially frustrating obstacle to revenue generation, causing payment delays and leading to uncompensated medical care.
Denial Management in Medical Billing vs Healthcare: Is There a Difference?
Denial management in medical billing and healthcare share the common goal of reducing claim denials, yet they differ significantly in scope and focus. Medical billing denial management primarily concentrates on the granular details of claim processing, such as ensuring coding accuracy, verifying documentation, and promptly addressing rejected claims. On the other hand, healthcare denial management takes a broader perspective, focusing on system-wide financial optimization, analyzing trends across departments, and implementing organization-wide policies to minimize revenue loss.
Despite these differences, there are overlapping areas where the two functions work together. For instance, by emphasizing correct coding practices in medical billing, healthcare organizations can reduce a significant portion of denials at the source. Both functions also rely heavily on communication and data analysis to identify patterns and implement strategies tailored to mitigate recurring issues. This collaborative effort ensures end-to-end revenue cycle efficiency.
Examples of Denial Management in Medical Billing and Healthcare
Medical Billing Example
A billing specialist receives notice of a denied claim due to an incorrect CPT code used during submission. Upon reviewing the documentation, the specialist discovers that a minor error was made when assigning the procedure code. The specialist corrects the mistake, resubmits the claim with the appropriate CPT code, and ensures all supporting documents are attached. This diligent follow-up results in the claim being approved, securing the payment for services rendered.
Healthcare Example
A hospital identifies frequent denials stemming from missing prior authorizations for specific procedures. To address this issue, the administrative team conducts an analysis and finds that delays often occur during the scheduling phase. The hospital implements a new verification process where staff confirms insurance requirements and obtains necessary authorizations before appointments are finalized. Over time, this proactive measure significantly reduces future denials related to prior authorizations, improving the hospital's overall financial performance and patient satisfaction.
What is Denial Prevention and Management?
In healthcare, denial management involves analyzing and preventing claim denials made by insurance companies or other relevant payers. The purpose of this task is to minimize the possibility of an insurance company rejecting the provider’s reimbursement request so that they can maintain steady revenues.
Example of Denial Prevention and Management
A medical clinic notices an uptick in claim denials attributed to coding errors, particularly with diagnosis and procedure mismatches. Upon investigation, the clinic determines that staff members lack consistent training on the latest coding updates and guidelines. To address the issue, the clinic introduces a comprehensive training program focused on accurate coding practices and keeping team members updated on changes to CPT and ICD codes. Additionally, they adopt third-party tools to streamline coding accuracy and compliance, such as automated coding software integrated into their practice management system.
By leveraging these tools and investing in staff education, the clinic decreases coding-related denials by 45% within six months. This not only improves the revenue cycle by ensuring steady reimbursement flow but also reduces administrative time spent on appeals and resubmissions. For further assistance in implementing similar denial management strategies, Adonis offers tailored solutions to optimize revenue cycle efficiency and reduce denials effectively.
The Importance of Denial Prevention and Management
Some healthcare professionals may view denial prevention and management as an arduous or unnecessary task. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Denied claims can cause payment delays that harm financial stability and operational efficiency. When denied claims are not challenged or addressed, they ultimately lead to revenue loss, which impacts the ability to invest in staff and technology that curates optimal patient care.
In the long term, high-quality denial management in healthcare settings can help providers collect the data they need to maintain accurate patient records and deliver premium personalized care services. As such, denial prevention will boost patient satisfaction and loyalty while increasing net revenue.
Common Causes of Denials in Healthcare
So, what are the most common causes of claims denials? Reasons healthcare professionals often encounter include:
Paperwork errors: Incomplete or incorrect documentation will often lead to denials. This could be in the form of a typo, and outdated home address, or incorrect patient information on file, for example. It’s also possible for the healthcare facility to accidentally submit an incorrect billing code or another piece of vital information.
- Example: A clinic submitted 150 claims with incorrect patient information, including outdated addresses and spelling errors in patient names. These errors resulted in 25 denials, leading to a revenue loss of $10,000. With a proactive approach to verifying and updating patient information during each visit, the clinic was able to reduce this type of denial by 80% within three months, preserving revenue and improving operational workflows.
Lack of medical necessity: It’s often required that healthcare providers submit proof that the services they are providing are required for the patient’s care. In some cases, a claim denied on grounds of necessity may simply require healthcare providers to provide further details about the medical condition in question. For example, they may need to provide relevant test results supporting a diagnosis or proof that other treatments have not worked well in the past.
- Example: An orthopedic practice faced 30 denials for knee surgery claims due to insufficient documentation of medical necessity. Upon closer review, it was discovered that they had not included necessary imaging results or comprehensive physician notes. After resubmitting these claims with the required documentation, the practice successfully appealed 20 denials, recovering $12,000 in payments. Additionally, they implemented a preemptive documentation checklist, reducing similar issues in future claims by 60%.
Non-covered claims: Insurance providers offer different types and levels of coverage for patients. For example, few providers cover cosmetic treatments or those without FDA approval. Some patients are covered only by basic plans, including treatments detailed in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The definition of an “essential benefit” under the ACA can differ between states – an issue that can cause confusion and lead to claim denials.
- Example: A dermatology center had 40 claims denied for cosmetic procedures that were not covered by patients' insurance plans. These denials resulted in a $25,000 revenue loss. Following the denials, the practice introduced a policy of conducting pre-treatment insurance eligibility reviews. By identifying coverage gaps early, they were able to educate patients about their out-of-pocket expenses, reducing non-covered service denials by 70% over six months.
Provider network problems: Some patients are only granted coverage for services offered by providers within their insurance plan’s provider network. Failure to select a provider within this network can lead to claim denials (note that exceptions may be made for emergency treatments).
- Example: A hospital experienced 50 denials when patients sought care outside their insurance networks, leading to a $15,000 payment gap. By requiring verification of a patient’s insurance network status during appointment scheduling and maintaining updated lists of in-network providers, the hospital reduced out-of-network denials by 85%. They also began educating patients on the implications of staying within their insurance networks.
Duplicate claims: Duplicate claims occur when providers mistakenly submit multiple claims for the same service, leading insurers to reject them. These errors are often the result of miscommunication or process inefficiencies within the billing department.
- Example: A radiology group inadvertently submitted duplicate claims for 20 imaging procedures due to uncoordinated claim filing routines among its staff. These errors led to 12 denials and a total revenue loss of $4,500. To prevent future occurrences, the practice implemented an automated claims management system that identifies duplicates before submission, reducing duplicate claims incidents by 90%.
Timeliness issues: Submitting claims outside of the allowable timeframe set by an insurer is a common reason for denials. Deadlines can be as short as 30 days, varying by payer contract and policy type. Effective claims tracking and prompt filing are necessary to adhere to these timelines.
- Example: A primary care provider missed the 30-day submission deadline for 20 claims due to a lack of clear scheduling and tracking in their billing processes. These late submissions resulted in denials and a loss of $8,000 in revenue. To address this, the practice introduced a claims submission tracking tool that alerts billing staff when deadlines are approaching. Within six months, they reduced missed deadlines by 95%, preserving valuable reimbursements.
The Denials Management Process
Claim denial management in healthcare involves a series of tasks, including:
- Denial analysis: Analyzing the details of every denial will help healthcare professionals identify the most common forms of denial. This job involves collecting information about providers, payers, and procedures typically involved with denials, as well as the types of mistakes that could lead to denials.
- Root cause analysis: Understanding the causes of denials is vital for preventing further incidences. Reasons for claim denials could include missing data, lack of official authorization, unnecessary treatments, late submissions, coding errors, and more.
- Preventive strategizing: Denial prevention involves careful strategizing to minimize avoidable denials through, for example, better collaboration between healthcare teams and more staff training.
- Appeal administration: Claim denial management in healthcare settings often requires significant administrative work, including appealing denied claims. Appealing can help providers avoid financial losses caused by simple administrative errors.
- Process improvement: Effective denial prevention requires consistent and committed improvement processes that track reasons for claim denials and work to avoid as many denials as possible.
Strategies for Effective Denial Prevention
While every healthcare provider’s denial prevention strategy should be tailored to their individual needs, the following best practices will help every facility looking to protect revenue flows:
Enhancing documentation practices: Healthcare providers must ensure their documentation practices are robust and easy to follow, minimizing the possibility of incomplete or inaccurate data collection. Improvements could include reorganizing databases, standardizing document naming and filing processes, or automating data inputting operations.
Implement robust claims scrubbing operations: Claims scrubbing refers to the process of checking claims before they’re submitted to an insurer, ensuring they’re accurate and aren’t missing any details. As well as preventing claims denials, this process will speed up payments and improve staff productivity by reducing administrative load.
Training and educating staff: Training staff about the processes involved with denial prevention, as well as its importance, will help avoid unnecessary errors and enhance overall productivity.
Strengthening payer relationships: Building relationships with payers will ensure lines of communication remain open and any issues or disputes are resolved quickly.
Leveraging technology: RCM technology has helped many healthcare providers decrease their administrative burden by automating tedious and time consuming tasks. For example, investing in revenue cycle automation software can help healthcare providers identify patient eligibility for certain treatments, collect patient data, process payments, identify trends, and more.
Optimize Your Denial Management Process
If you’re looking to optimize your denial management strategy without adding to employee workloads, Adonis is here to help. We offer revenue cycle automation technology designed to help you recover and collect the revenue you deserve. Adonis Intelligence leverages AI and machine learning to alert you to denial trends, identify root-cause issues, detect underpayments, and more.
To find out more and get started, request a demo.
.svg)
