The Big Beautiful Bill: How It Impacts Health Systems’ Revenue Cycle Management

Since it was passed last July, I’ve come to realize that the legislation dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is a seismic shift for every revenue cycle management (RCM) team in the country. It cuts directly into the mechanisms that have long stabilized the finances of health systems: Medicaid supplemental payments, predictable payer mix, and reliable reimbursement flows.

Across organizations I work with, one theme keeps surfacing: without proactive change, the Bill’s impact on Medicaid, payer behavior, coverage eligibility, and financial risk will destabilize even the best RCM operations. With reductions in federal support, tighter payer scrutiny, and rising uncompensated-care exposure, the pressures will be felt immediately and deeply.

Below, I cover what the Bill changes, the operational fallout RCM leaders should expect, and a roadmap for how finance and revenue executives can navigate the disruption ahead.

What the Big Beautiful Bill Does, and Why It Matters to RCM

OBBBA fundamentally reshapes how Medicaid is financed at the state level. For years, health systems have relied on mechanisms such as provider taxes and state-directed payments (SDPs) to help states draw down enhanced federal matching funds. These mechanisms helped cover thin margins, especially in systems with large Medicaid populations. Under the new law, that backstop is beginning to erode.

Provider tax caps are scheduled to fall steadily, from roughly 6% today to 3.5% by 2032. SDPs face new restrictions and oversight. As these funds decline, hospitals and health systems, especially safety-net institutions, are likely to experience the largest financial shock.

At the same time, the Bill tightens eligibility criteria for Medicaid and marketplace plans. Many patients who previously qualified for subsidized coverage may now fall into coverage gaps. Even small shifts in eligibility can significantly alter patient mix; the Bill introduces the potential for large swings in self-pay volume and uninsured treatment.

The Bill also sets the stage for greater reimbursement scrutiny. Medicare and commercial payers are already signaling stronger prior-authorization requirements, more rigorous medical-necessity reviews, and tighter coding surveillance. Health systems that have grown accustomed to predictable payment flows will face more friction, more paperwork, and more denials.

For RCM leaders, this will threaten reliable revenue from stable payer mix, predictable reimbursement, and clear collections pathways. When this occurs, everything else in the revenue cycle, from scheduling and coding to cash posting and reporting, becomes vulnerable.

The Operational Fallout: What RCM Teams Will Face

When I discuss the Bill with health system executives, one question comes up repeatedly: what does all of this mean for our day-to-day operations? The answer is stark.

1. Rising Uncompensated Care and Self-Pay Risk
Coverage tightening means RCM teams should prepare for a surge in uninsured and underinsured patients. Even a 5–10% shift in payer mix toward self-pay can wipe out millions in margin. Under OBBBA, those shifts could be far larger. Without strengthened financial-counseling programs, flexible payment plans, and early patient engagement, much of this revenue will drift into bad debt.

2. Escalating Denials, Prior Authorization, and Documentation Pressure
Payers are preparing for a post-Bill environment by increasing scrutiny. That means tighter prior authorization, more precise documentation requirements, and more aggressive coding audits. A single lapse in medical necessity documentation can turn a reimbursable service into a denied claim. In my experience, whenever administrative burden spikes, revenue leakage follows, unless RCM teams upgrade the precision and oversight of their workflows.

3. Cash-Flow Volatility and Margin Compression
As reimbursement becomes more unpredictable and uncompensated care grows, even well-run systems could experience major cash turbulence. One model I reviewed projected that a $1–2 billion health system could see a 16-percent decline in operating margin under certain OBBBA scenarios. Margins that were already thin will bend further, and some may break.

4. Administrative Overhead Surge
To manage rising denials, more self-pay collections, and expanded charity-care determinations, RCM workloads will increase sharply. Without added investment in staff capacity, automation, and training, the cost of maintaining revenue integrity may exceed what teams can absorb.

5. Risk to Access, Service Lines, and Institutional Stability
For safety-net, rural, and community hospitals (many heavily dependent on Medicaid), the Bill’s restrictions on supplemental funding create existential risk. Service-line reductions, access cutbacks, and even closures will ripple through referral networks and payer dynamics, further stressing RCM teams already operating at capacity.

How RCM Leaders and CFOs Can Respond

The disruption is real. But so is the opportunity to design a stronger, more resilient revenue cycle. Based on the health systems I work with, several priorities rise to the top.

1. Re-engineer Financial Counseling and Patient Engagement
The most effective systems will accelerate investment in pre-service workflows: eligibility checks, up-front cost estimates, payment-plan offerings, and charity-care screening. When financial conversations happen early, not after a patient receives a bill, revenue capture improves, and bad debt declines. Under OBBBA, early engagement becomes non-negotiable.

2. Strengthen Denials Prevention, Coding Quality, and Prior Authorization Infrastructure
This is the moment to strengthen clinical documentation, coding accuracy, and pre-claim audits. RCM leaders should expand their prior-authorization teams, adopt more advanced claim-scrubbing tools, and integrate real-time analytics to catch high-risk claims before submission. Workflows enabled with agentic AI can significantly help with these tasks and reduce avoidable denials, but only when implemented in tandem with disciplined process redesign.

3. Revisit Payer Contracts and Care-Delivery Strategy
CFOs should reassess payer mix, renegotiate contracts when leverage allows, and explore alternative payment models that reward outcomes rather than volume. At the same time, shifting more services into outpatient settings can stabilize margins and align with new reimbursement realities. OBBBA’s financial pressures will accelerate the movement toward lower-cost care sites.

4. Model Financial Scenarios and Stress-Test Capital Planning
Finance and RCM leaders need to build conservative models that account for higher uninsured rates, lower supplemental Medicaid payments, and slower cash collections. These models should directly inform staffing decisions, capital projects, technology investments, and risk-mitigation strategies.

5. Advocate and Partner Strategically
While operational adjustments are essential, policy engagement matters, too. Executives should collaborate with state leaders, community organizations, and payer partners to seek mitigation pathways and stabilize regional safety nets. Strategic partnerships, whether with ambulatory centers, community health organizations, or technology platforms, will become a lifeline for systems navigating the transition.

Can RCM Seize The Moment?

The Big Beautiful Bill is probably the most consequential healthcare-finance legislation in a generation. For RCM teams, it exposes structural vulnerabilities. The comfortable assumptions of steady payer mix, reliable reimbursement, manageable self-pay volumes, no longer apply.

But with disciplined planning, rigorous operational redesign, and strategic financial leadership, health systems can emerge stronger. The question for every RCM leader and CFO is not whether this new reality is manageable, but whether they will seize the moment to rebuild their revenue cycle as a more resilient, efficient, and financially-grounded operation. Those who move early and decisively won’t just preserve margin, but will position their organizations for long-term sustainability in a post-OBBBA world.

‍